Do you agree or disagree?
Teachers in past have higher social values and people appreciated them even more than nowadays.
Without any doubts, teachers play an important role in our society. However, it seems that they have not suitable social level on our modern life. In this regret, I have to admit that I am in opinion of current teachers are not valued and appreciated than past. There are a couple of reasons in support of my view. I will elaborate my reasons in this essay and try to shed some light on my perspective through ample examples.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that nowadays this is universally believe that by advent of new technology and computer aid programs there is no need for real teachers. The story of my uncle could justify my reason. Couple years ago he bought a CD program which involved a considerable number of videos of class rooms, as a result, he dismiss the importance of her child's teacher. To make a long story short, by accessing children and parents to new means of educating materials, they believe that time is arrive to traditionally ways of teaching on schools, hence, they decline teachers situation and social level.
From another aspect we should bear in mind that moral concepts which should convey from generation to generation become less important ever than before. My personal anecdote will well demonstrate this point of view. My grandparents did not dedicate enough time to educate and tech well their children, hence, my parents' mind shape differently from their ancestors. Besides, they do not know the value of schooling and teaching; therefor, my parents do not appreciate teachers’ efforts. If these kind of behavior transform to me and my next generation, the consequence will be more decline in teachers’ social positions. The story above could shed some light on the reasons behind why teachers are less appreciated by society than past.
Taken all aspects mentioned above into consideration, I am pretty convinced that there are a number of reasons why teachers' are not highly valued in our modern world such as followering of new technology which dismiss the importance of teachers. Meanwhile, there is another school of tough which believes teachers become more valued nowadays, due to the rise in number of university.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
...ed is that nowadays this is universally believe that by advent of new technology and co...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 348, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'dismisses'.
Suggestion: dismisses
... videos of class rooms, as a result, he dismiss the importance of her childs teacher. T...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 519, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'arrived'.
Suggestion: arrived
...ng materials, they believe that time is arrive to traditionally ways of teaching on sc...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...t appreciate teachers' efforts. If these kind of behavior transform to me and my next...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 746, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... less appreciated by society than past. Taken all aspects mentioned above into c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, hence, however, if, so, well, while, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 365.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00821917808 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77114857096 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539726027397 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3383869207 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.529411765 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4705882353 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187401812253 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651731714621 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760534139393 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117168807903 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470213898597 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.