Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.
There is no doubt that nowadays, having a plan for the future the crucial role in the people’ life. A controversial question arises in this issue how the young people organize their plans for their future in order to modern life is very complex. However, the young people who do not define any plan for their may have some problems in their future’s life. I subscribe this idea which for the modern need a programmed plan to get prosperous as soon as, and explain hereunder.
First and foremost, getting a job for earn suitable income and revenue is very strictly because of jobs in the modern’s life more difficult and complicated than the past times. Typically, in the contemporary, considerably demanding more knowledge and ability for getting a job or work is enhancing. The young people for this plan which is acquiring knowledge have gone to the universities or some companies to getting enough ability to do a specific job that they can have high performance in every task. An empirical study in Asia shows that the young people have more preparing and organizing for their task be more prosperous in every task than other who be without a plan and arrange.
Secondly, in the modern society, life is very complicated and elaborated and in the everyone’s life can arise some problems for everyone abruptly or suddenly. Without any plans and programs not only evoke some distraction in their mind but also get them in the colossal predicament. The program allows them to predict and anticipate any problems may confront; Therefore, the young people manage the difficulties which will be, which cause prevent any anxiety and stress from their mind and help them be so much happier and thriller. With psychological standpoint, many young people have more plan and organize for their future. They are more confident in their work, and this act is paving the way for flourishing them and be more successful. On the other hand, without plan cause some problems for their mind and have a lot of difficulty with their proximity people.
All in all, have plan and program for future not only useful for young people, but every people should have the plan to prevent some problems and have sufficient ability for doing every task for flourishing as well.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-17 | Vishnupri | 60 | view |
2020-01-12 | naziii | 70 | view |
2019-12-29 | zahra.tmmm | 70 | view |
2019-12-29 | zahra.tmmm | 70 | view |
2019-12-28 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 90 | view |
- It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from thepublic." 66
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment- doing things they like to do – rather than doing things they should do. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. 73
- Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. 73
- It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 18, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'planned'.
Suggestion: planned
...eir proximity people. All in all, have plan and program for future not only useful ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing every task for flourishing as well.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92708333333 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69481804039 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458333333333 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 598.5 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.0247339433 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.133333333 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411019533372 0.236089414692 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167754381859 0.076458572812 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923989583453 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297345884935 0.150856017488 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673498914116 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.