What information does the listening passage provide to supplement information.
The article states that the discussion about Dodgson Collage which recive huge bequest from its former students. A committee of collage was to determine the best way to put the bequest into use and provide reasons of support. However, the professor explains that the three ways to spent money to make the collage and refers each of the authors reasons.
first, The reading claims that administrator wants to decide to develop new classroom bulding. The professor refutes this points by saying that faculty disagree with it and they wants to decrease the additional class size. He states that ...
Second, the article posits that administrator wants to develop new gymnasiyam instead of old gymnasiyam. however, the professor say that faculty oppose to develop new gymnasiyam they wants to renovate old gymnasiyam. According to the professor, faculty wants to renovate olad gymnasiyam which was 70 years old.
Third, The reading claims that an administrator wants to pay raises for themselves. The professor oppose this point by claiming that faculty wants to give higher scholarship to student. We also learn that ..
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-12-16 | photoadesh | 3 | view |
- smoking 60
- Some students prefer classes with open discussion between the students and professor and almost no lecture other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- smoking 60
- What information does the listening passage provide to supplement information. 3
- It is better to marry with someone who is similar to you, rather than someone who is different from you. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
... refers each of the authors reasons. first, The reading claims that administrator ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'want'
Suggestion: want
... that faculty disagree with it and they wants to decrease the additional class size. ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...w gymnasiyam instead of old gymnasiyam. however, the professor say that faculty oppose ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'want'
Suggestion: want
...y oppose to develop new gymnasiyam they wants to renovate old gymnasiyam. According t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'opposes'.
Suggestion: opposes
...ay raises for themselves. The professor oppose this point by claiming that faculty wan...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...olarship to student. We also learn that ..
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, third, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 1373.03311258 69% => OK
No of words: 178.0 270.72406181 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31460674157 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64740730378 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 145.348785872 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561797752809 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 419.366225166 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6045115877 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8333333333 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8333333333 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0109740569905 0.272083759551 4% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00435415445833 0.0996497079465 4% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0144410966175 0.0662205650399 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00656536000507 0.162205337803 4% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0113715370988 0.0443174109184 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.