The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing
and industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990.
The three bar charts show average years of schooling, numbers of scientists and technicians,
and research and development spending in developing and developed countries. Figures are
given for 1980 and 1990.
It is clear from the charts that the figures for developed countries are much higher than those
for developing nations. Also, the charts show an overall increase in participation in education
and science from 1980 to 1990.
People in developing nations attended school for an average of around 3 years, with only a
slight increase in years of schooling from 1980 to 1990. On the other hand, the figure for
industrialized countries rose from nearly 9 years of schooling in 1980 to nearly 11 years in
1990.
From 1980 to 1990, the number of scientists and technicians in industrialized countries
almost doubled to about 70 per 1000 people. Spending on research and development also saw
rapid growth in these countries, reaching $350 billion in 1990. By contrast, the number of
science workers in developing countries remained below 20 per 1000 people, and research
spending fell from about $50 billion to only $25 billion
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-12-19 | Mela Nguyen | 67 | view |
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. 84
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 61
- The pie chart shows the percentage of persons arrested in the five years ending 1994 and the bar chart shows the most recent reasons for arrest 84
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 73
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developingand industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26630434783 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84163261967 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516304347826 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2393372534 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 14.0 3.83414634146 365% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282222593978 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138805570029 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10695348966 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111879128839 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950405835983 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.