The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates how much carbon dioxide (CO2) was emitted by each person in four countries over the course of 40 years, starting in 1967.
Looking at the graph, it is obvious that the United Kingdom and Sweden experienced a significant decrease in the amount of CO2, while the figures of Italy and Portugal showed an opposite trend. During the given period, the UK is the largest CO2 producer.
In 1967, each person in the UK generated about 11 metric tonnes of CO2. It was followed by the figure for Sweden, which registered almost 9 metric tonnes. After reaching its highest point of more than 10 metric tonnes, the amount of CO2 emissions per person in Sweden saw a sharp decrease to below 6 metric tonnes of CO2 in 2007. The figure for the UK in the same year was about 9 metric tonnes.
By contrast, the CO2 emissions in the other two nations increased dramatically in the observed period. In 1967, each Italian person released just above 4 metric tonnes of CO2. The figure rose and overtook that of Sweden after 1987. From 1997 to 2007, Sweden witnessed a plateau in the amount of CO2 that each person emitted, which was below 8metric tonnes. Portugal registered the lowest amount of CO2, just above 1 metric tonnes, at the beginning of the 40- year period. The figure then went up sharply and reached more than 5 metric tonnes, which was the same amount as Sweden’s in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-03 | Ha Linh Lee | 57 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1161.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6814516129 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36967473521 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504032258065 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7944032175 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3076923077 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0769230769 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.92307692308 5.23603664747 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22525906039 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876590778848 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593377915871 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15435279926 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225159226634 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.