The young today spend a large amount of their leisure time in shopping centers. It is feared that this trend can bring negative influences on the youths and the society. I strongly agree with this view.
It is often believed that people who choose to work earlier in their life and permanently settle into the same profession are able to reap the benefit of joy as compared to those social workers who continuously switching jobs. In my view, both types of options could bestow the comparable feeling of satisfaction.
On the one hand, people who opt to work early and settle down in the same work may reap the benefits of satisfaction. Those who identify their interest early and able to settle in the type of job for whom they are carving for may have a privilege to expose them to their aptitudes, skills, and expertise at work at hand. In this way they would further excel at their work and able to earn more which would be sufficient to satisfy their entertainment and education needs. Hence, it is clear that how early job doing creates a cycle of satisfaction.
Nevertheless, the individuals who continuously hopping their work could also feel content with their work. Firstly as these members of society frequently changing their jobs the automatically expose them to different skills and experiences. They don’t stay in their comfort zone to feel the satisfaction and job, instead, they choose to thrive and take challenges. Secondly, when social workers switch jobs there are higher chances that they would find the work that is matching with aptitude and personal interest. Therefore there is sufficient evidence to suggest the job hoppers could also find exhalation in working.
All in all, it could be said not only the people who begin working early and settle in the same working style for the rest of the life but also the kind of people who constantly switching jobs could also the reap the benefits of content in their work.
- The young today spend a large amount of their leisure time in shopping centers. It is feared that this trend can bring negative influences on the youths and the society. I strongly agree with this view. 11
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 522, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ng with aptitude and personal interest. Therefore there is sufficient evidence to suggest...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 205, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ho constantly switching jobs could also the reap the benefits of content in their work. ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, kind of, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89597315436 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61486923225 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0305860382 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.583333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0636854416849 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0285414044388 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269438073844 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.040595040994 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182525563475 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.