children nutrition
The lack of adequate nutrition supplies not only causing the disruption of children's growth and development but also increasing the risk of children’s morbidity and mortality. In 2016, the number of children under five in Slarang Village are 1056 toddlers and 63 (5.96%) of them suffer from malnutrition. One of the solutions is improving the role of health worker. But with the number of 11 posyandu and 55 health workers, the promotive roles of 55 health workers in 11 posyandu at salarang village are less.The observation conducted at 4 posyandu showed that health workers only responsible for recording and weighing. Based on the interview, the health workers have lacked in knowledge of children nutrition and skill of counseling, they also haven’t health workers manual book. Community service activates have been implemented and the health worker manual book has been completed. The number of participants was 19 health workers, the knowledge about children's nutrition had increased from 61,8 to 93,7 and health worker’s skill of children nutrition counseling had been monitored by visited 6 posyandu where 11 health workers counseling exam results are more than 70.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-10 | Afifa Rizwan | 42 | view |
| 2018-01-04 | jesy | 56 | view |
- The diagrams bellow show how chocolate is made and how the price of a chocolate bar is divided up among those involved in the process 55
- Reading is more important for developing imagination and language skill than television Do you agree or disagree 74
- To what extent is the use of animals in scientific research acceptable 86
- health worker 56
- health worker 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 513, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...1 posyandu at salarang village are less.The observation conducted at 4 posyandu sho...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 1615.20841683 62% => OK
No of words: 185.0 315.596192385 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41621621622 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 4.20363070211 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95456710265 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 176.041082164 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578378378378 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 506.74238477 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.1349500049 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.142857143 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 7.06120827912 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261794648683 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140190978167 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141685982772 0.0667982634062 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261794648683 0.151304729494 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.33 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.