The table below shows the results of an airline survey in 2002 of economy class business travellers. The numbers indicate how many male of female passengers in each age group rated a particular feature as their most important in flight consideration.
The table indicates the results of an airline survey in 2002 of both men and women passengers with 4 age groups. These number of travellers shows in flights feature rankings in different groups.
Overall, most interviewee voted the seat is the most important feature when joining the flight whether old or young. Whereas, moving in flight is a service recorded in the lowest.
In term of seats and meals, the number of females in over 45 age group thought their seat is the most important consideration with 35 people, higher than that in age 25 – 45. Similarly, the rate of women in over 45 ye...
- The bar chart below show a survey of a group of young professionals aged 20 30 who were asked to state which factors motivated them to succeed 84
- The table below shows the results of an airline survey in 2002 of economy class business travellers The numbers indicate how many male of female passengers in each age group rated a particular feature as their most important in flight consideration 73
- The table below shows personal savings as a percentage of personal income for selected countries in 1970 1990 and 2000 83
- The charts below show part of the results of an extensive public survey on people s attitude to a range of issues 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...oining the flight whether old or young. Whereas, moving in flight is a service recorded...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54029525843 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.427962062 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4545454545 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2601970765 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986996631629 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787608506505 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168921852723 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844389528669 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.