Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.
Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The author of the issue claims that scientists should concentrate on any field of research and do not take their expectations of discovery into consideration. He further reasons that the anticipation of any research and its outcomes is impossible. Personally, I refute the rationale behind both the claim and reason.
To commence with, it is established beyond doubt that scientists and scholars play a pivotal role in every given society and their contribution helps a nation make a progress day in day out and flourish. Broadly speaking, scientists are interested in any field of research and we have to praise them for their discoveries. But they should stay focus on an area of studies that their results are known and predictable. As a tangible example, since the dawn of civilization crowds of people suffer from various diseases like cancer, HIV, heart disease and so forth. In fact, scientists should base their works to find a solution for these diseases and come up with a helpful and effective remedy to cure such kinds of diseases. To elucidate more on this issue, if scientists put their effort so as to make a discovery in any realm, it might be waste of time and money without any conspicuous success.
Another example of this is the contribution of scientists when it comes to lead a healthy life. During many years scientists make an effort to patronize humans to lead a healthy life by the cultivation of hygienic crops. Scientists know that research in such an area not only can be effective for people's health but also can enhance their value of research. Although work in any field of study might resolve and handle somehow and why questions, it is risky to try some unpredictable research without any certainty. As a matter of fact, scientists should bend over backward to base their research in areas that their outcomes are obvious and majorities of people can benefit from those research.
As far as the reason is concerned, it should be pointed out that there are many fields of research that prediction of their results is impossible but they could not be neglected. If we take a minute to ponder over it, astronomy is a field that plays an important role in the future of people and although it is impossible to anticipate its results, scientists know to the extent research in this field has the positive impact on the life of humans. In fact, natural resources are terminating here on earth, so, research in astronomy will helps scientists to address this problem and confront probable trials and tribulations in the future.
Having discussed both the claim and the reason, I reiterate that
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-06 | z.salahshoor | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | luciano.pisa | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | p30kh40 | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-17 | p30kh40 | 75 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | sanket007 | 66 | view |
- A company is going to give some money either to support arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose? 73
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun to play games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time to do things together that are related to s 73
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 50
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Writ 54
- tpo 46 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 791, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...s issue, if scientists put their effort so as to make a discovery in any realm, it might...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 539, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...n earth, so, research in astronomy will helps scientists to address this problem and ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, as to, broadly speaking, in fact, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 446.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90807174888 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76476674032 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7675956239 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.611111111 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308174673752 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1042254503 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725737252966 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179432976264 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646860202395 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.