In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Any field of study or work comprises of a dichotomy of workers namely, the experts and the beginners. Both classes of workers differ significantly from each other, in terms of experience, knowledge, and the most fundamental of them all is in being curious. It is beyond doubt that for making praiseworthy and significant contributions in any area if study, curiosity is the fundamental driving force. A neophyte’s propensity towards such a force places him at a much better position in making such important offerings in the field he renders his services.
It is a human tendency to show a copious amount of interest in a new activity that poses novel challenges till a person becomes an expert in it. The intransigent will to know even the most obscure details of the new work is the step an amateur takes to propel himself into a position of being an expert. Such a passion to learn and experiment wanes once a person imbibes most of the knowledge in a particular area of work. It is because of the propensity of humans to become bored of doing the same activity repeatedly that various organizations have to come up with a plethora of reforms and mutable plans for work to keep the workforce engaged and ensure that they work with alacrity. However, they do not guarantee to instill the workforce with the same enthusiasm they once showed when they first encountered the work. Hence, beginners tend to show more willingness to learn and work assiduously as compared to experts.
When it comes to making revolutionary contributions, the uninitiated are on par with the experts and sometimes even surpass them. When an individual enters a new area of work, an organization not only welcomes the person but also the innovative ideas and strategies that accompany him. They bring in a new way of thinking, much different from the banal approaches used by the professionals working in a particular area. This is the reason why most influential companies not only take the opinions of the experts but also consider the points made by the beginners in the hope of being exposed to a new approach of doing something or a remedy for an existing problem in the organization. Hence tyros are a source of new ideas.
It does not go without saying that experts are called so because of a reason. Being equipped with the experience and sufficient knowledge in their area of expertise, they are well aware of the projects that would give would be futile and unnecessary, and this is the point where they have an edge over the neophytes. A beginner, out of mere curiosity, can waste resources in pursuing dead-end goals and fail badly in the end. It is also possible that sometimes, the new area of work may seem so arcane and abstruse to the amateurs that instead of becoming encouraged and motivated by facing new challenges, they lose confidence and even become feckless.
Nevertheless, most people take new things as a challenge to be in a better place tomorrow. Making mistakes is a part of learning something new and it is these errors that guard a person later and prevents him from committing the same mistakes in the future as an expert. Hence, ingenious contributions are made by those who are willing to learn and imbibe the most about a new subject: they are the beginners.
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, at 77
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling r 66
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 62
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
Any field of study or work comprises of a dichotomy of workers namely, the expe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: BORED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'bored with'?
Suggestion: bored with
...e of the propensity of humans to become bored of doing the same activity repeatedly that...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a new way" with adverb for "new"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rategies that accompany him. They bring in a new way of thinking, much different from the ba...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 688, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...n existing problem in the organization. Hence tyros are a source of new ideas. It...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 411, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a new subject: they are the beginners.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2726.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 566.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81625441696 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87757670434 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85011411966 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 215.323595506 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494699646643 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 878.4 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7831892246 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.909090909 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100546464254 0.243740707755 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337396706105 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333362401898 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0606953131099 0.150359130593 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286687773022 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.