The maps show the centre of a small town called Islip and the plan for its development.
Summarise the information about the main features.
The maps provide the proposed growth about the centre of a town called Islip.
It is obvious that the traffic infrastructure would be improved because of the appearance of the dual carriageway. Moreover, there is an increase in the number of houses.
To be specific, at the present, there is just a main road between two rows of shops in the town centre, which is connected the East and the West of this city. However, the developed plan shows that a dual carriageway woulf be constructed surround the centre town, go through the school and instead of the countryside. It is more convinient for the residents to move around in the town. Besides, the main road will become the way for pedestrians only.
Additionaly, more and more houses will be built in the northeast and southeast of the town to service the citizens needs. However, the number of the shops will reduce and be replaced by Bus station and carpark.
- The charts show women's highest education in 1945 and 1995. Summarise the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- greenhouse 11
- Imprionment 11
- Many people work at home using modern technology today. Some people think only workers benefit from this, not the employers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Topic: Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 757.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73125 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66926224592 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.189537889 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1111111111 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212859191239 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862301928119 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102502547321 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138397608385 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1380229268 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.