The graph below shows the four leading types of farming produce in Mitchford city between in 1970-2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the four leading types of farming produce in Mitchford city between in 1970-2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.

A glance at provided graph reveals 4 major types of products which are province in Mitchford farms during the period from 1970 to 2000. It is evident that among cotton, corn wheat and sugar, cotton hold dominant position for most of the period.

Increase from 20000 dollars in 1970, increasing demand for cotton leaded to rapid climb in the production reaching to a plan point of 90000 dollars in 1990. The following 10 years saw considerable decline in this figure. Production of corn and sugar were comparable during the first decade making 30 and 25 thousand dollars respectively. However, the gap between to widened for the rest of the period as sugar producing overtook corn production and made 45000 dollars which is 15000 dollars more than corn in 2000. It is interesting to note that wheat production fluctuated between 40 and 50 thousand dollars for 30 years.

All in all, cotton production made the dominant farming produce in 1980 even though it slid away and stopped at the rate which was the same as in 1970. Also position of corn production was taken by sugar and demand for wheat did not altered at all.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2013-11-09 Azizkhan Nightshade 75 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Azizkhan Nightshade :

Comments

Sentence: However, the gap between to widened for the rest of the period as sugar producing overtook corn production and made 45000 dollars which is 15000 dollars more than corn in 2000.
Suggestion: Can you re-write this sentence?

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 194 200
No. of Characters: 909 1000
No. of Different Words: 111 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.732 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.686 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.42 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 61 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 44 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 27 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 15 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.556 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.309 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.418 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.608 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.074 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4