chart 1 below shows a normal price of a tablet
The charts depict average prices, promotional discounts, sales uplifts and advertising budgets for seven stores sailing tablet computers.
Regarding computer costs, Slaker, Jones, Scots and Fraser have an average price within $299-321 each, followed by Lewis and Nova with quite high costs, comprising $460 and $565 accordingly. The only excepting is Smith having the lowest price, at only $180. A similar grouping can be seen in promotional discounts provided. For example, the 4 mid-priced stores offering 10% discount, the two higher-priced shops giving $20 and Smith introducing only 5% sale.
Regarding outlifts in sales throughout promotions, Nova and Lewis again demonstrate the highest rates, hitting roughly 25% and 21% respectively, whereas the figures for Fraser, Scots, Jones and Slaker vary from 12% to 14% each. The rate for Smith is the lowest, making up just over 4%. Turning to television advertising, the most striking point is that Slaker, Jones, Scots and Fraser contribute the largest amount of financial resources to advertising between $63,000 and $70,000, while Lewis and Nova have much lower spends at $18,000 and $21,000. However, Smith spend no money at all.
To summary, clear correlations can be noticed between prices, promotional discounts and the amount of money devoted to commercials.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-14 | neocsc | 82 | view |
| 2018-03-21 | GulyamovOT | 92 | view |
| 2018-03-21 | GulyamovOT | 84 | view |
| 2018-03-21 | GulyamovOT | 92 | view |
| 2018-03-21 | GulyamovOT | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 558, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Smith) must be used with a third-person verb: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...ends at 8,000 and 1,000. However, Smith spend no money at all. To summary, clear c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, however, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46305418719 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75294102153 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679802955665 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.0222500348 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.9 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0834614136225 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328985289639 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445619073873 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0535916321923 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540140362348 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.