Schools should do more to prepare students for the non-academic aspects of adulthood.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Most parents do significant efforts to enroll their children into the most prestigious schools in their town, adressing the conception that a good academic preparation will thrive to a successful development in their adulthood. However, the measure to determine if an school is good or not is just done from an academic perspective, dismissing the education in other areas equally important as academics, as ethics, financial management and politics.
Corruption has always been one of the most relevant problems in political management of any country, specially in third-world. In Latin America, the corruption has caused that trust in goverment decreased to levels never seen before. Most of the cases, corrupt politicians are people with strong academic background but poor ethical values. If schools include ethics as part of their core programs, in the long-term, children who have received this education will be citizens with (at least) a notion of what is required to be a social leader.
Another element that schools should include in their core program is financial management. There is no doubt that most of the financial problems of people is due to lack of knowledge of how manage their money and awareness of their own debt capacity based on their income. Schools can have a huge impact if children since their early ages start to understand how money has to be manage and the responsability that it carries in the future.
Receive the benefits of a non-academic preparation at schools, implies that families have to be responsible with the selection of the school because, this complimentary education can oppose to their religious, economic or political beliefs. Few people can argue that this non-academic education has to be delivered at home, but in the current context of society, most of the parent do not have the time to teach their children these topics with the rigurosity that it requires.
In conclusion, non-academic education should be part of the core preparation of children at schools, not only for the benefits in their own development, also for the impact of future generations in social, political and economic context.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-12 | gvnix | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Chiragzeel | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | niksact101 | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | neha37930 | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | pyash | 66 | view |
- The city council of Town X has proposed reducing the city's electric expenses by switching all the lights in public building from incandescent bulbs to light-emitting diodes (LEDs). The switch would be made gradually as the old incandescent bulbs burn out 50
- Schools should do more to prepare students for the non-academic aspects of adulthood.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developin 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...d. However, the measure to determine if an school is good or not is just done from...
^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'parted'?
Suggestion: parted
...usion, non-academic education should be part of the core preparation of children at ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, third, as to, at least, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 348.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23275862069 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92055117577 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508620689655 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.1353763225 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.75 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 23.4991977007 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114068113904 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479217259751 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394762978915 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076608887703 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037281913226 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 14.1392134831 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.