Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactive. Do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that new technological discoveries like smart phones are changing people into socially less interactive. I absolutely agree with this statement and in following paragraphs I will scrutinize reasons and write in details.
To begin with, mobile phones have made communication faster and cheaper, thus one can easily reach their dear ones who are living in any part on the earth. It is also possible to say , as mobiles are becoming more smarter , people can share their special memories through social networks. For instance, nowadays people can share their personal messages, photos, documents on Facebook and WhatsApp easily by using smartphones.
On the other hand, mobiles have adverse affects too on the society. Children have become less active and contain themselves within the walls and play mobile games, consequently, they have fewer friends. Adults too have become socially inactive as they are well occupied in chat with their buddies on social network sites. Earlier people used to go out at nights within their neighbors and made conversations about different topics. Regardless, we cannot witness this kind of scenes too much today. Parents are too busy with their mobiles that they often forget to spend valuable time with their children thus, children feel isolated which affects their moralty, too.
To sum up, while invention of smart phones provided more comfort to the society, it has broadened the social gap between people and given reason to the feeling of isolation among people, especially among kids.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-10 | thanushcst | 67 | view |
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of public To what extend do you agree or disagree 60
- Some people argue that technological inventions such as mobile phones are making people socially less interactive Do you agree or disagree 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...on the earth. It is also possible to say , as mobiles are becoming more smarter , ...
^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'smarter' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: smarter
...ssible to say , as mobiles are becoming more smarter , people can share their special memori...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y , as mobiles are becoming more smarter , people can share their special memories...
^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to have'?
Suggestion: to have
...uently, they have fewer friends. Adults too have become socially inactive as they are we...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, so, thus, well, while, for instance, kind of, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37142857143 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51224280218 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.665306122449 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0623574619 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192746946719 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756517433434 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085033275644 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13352265509 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825849409827 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.