Is tourism in less developed countries advantage or disadvantage? Discuss your views and give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of the tourism industry in the less developed country and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of tourism management is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that study of tourist attraction can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, tourism industry can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of introducing the unique monumental, as well as ancient culture, are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of tourist attraction on economic growth. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both cultural heritage and cultural value apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of getting information about the role of tourist in the less developed country, tourism industry might increase the consequences of national tradition. Moreover, fundamental aspects of ancient monuments would relate to this reality that the demerits of spoiling the eco-system by tourists pertain to the influx of tourists. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of foreign countries is correlated negatively with globalization. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of tourism and hospitality.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of tourism industry outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of increasing the earning capacity of developed country prove the significance of historical monuments, but also pinpoint social implications.
- Polygamy has led to massive divorce rates around the globe. Give the possible option for this issue and various solutions to reduce the rate. 85
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 85
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? . 11
- In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society? 69
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72695035461 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21103745402 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620567375887 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.065027696 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.583333333 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137403699795 0.242375264174 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486153020975 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535707089254 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832356496357 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382264155542 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.99 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.