integrated writing
The passage talks about pterosaurs that are kind of ancient group of reptiles and it describes that these animals couldn't flight, and presents three reasons. Although, the lecture has opposite view and refuses each of passage reasons. Actually, recent research has revealed that pterosaurs have been capable to flight.
First, the passage mentions that pterosaurs were kind of cold-blooded animals and they couldn't produce enough energy for flight like other cold-blooded animals. On the other hand, the lecture says discovery on their fossils shows that they had dense hair covering on their body. Actually, this is for warm-blooded animals to keep their high body temperature in extremely cold conditions. So, as warm-blooded animals can supply enough energy, pterosaurs could supply same energy too. Indeed they did not have problem for flight.
Second, the passage accounts for us pterosaurs were so heavy to be able flight, but the lecture has another view. Lecture explains that anatomy features of these animals shows they were light weight compared to their size. There are hollows in their bones that cause they will be light despite their large body. Due to their low weight, they could keep airborne by powered flight. So, those ancient animals had no problem to flight.
Third, the passage says that all animals with powered flight are able to take off from ground by jumping with their legs or running to gain speed and then jump. On the other hand, lecture mentions that there is difference between birds and pterosaurs. Birds can jump or run with their hind limbs. Actually birds have two limbs that push the ground with them to flight, but pterosaurs had four limbs. They used their four limbs to gained speed and then jump; like bat that is a modern animal. Lecture also explains that they used their four limbs to push the ground not just back ones. Finally, they had not any problem to run with their four limbs and then flight.
- hypothesis about an ancient animal that could be able to fly or not 73
- Some people believe that parents should pay their children a small amount of money to do jobs around the home (such as washing the dishes or taking out the garbage), while other people believe that parents should not pay their children to do these tasks. 73
- do you agree or disagree with the statement?rich people should allocate their wealth with poor people. 76
- do you agree or dissagree?video games are efficient for students to learn better in schools. 60
- is the high-quality education and excellent teachers in the high school is the most important factor for students to succeed at university or college? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...les and it describes that these animals couldnt flight, and presents three reasons. Alt...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...e kind of cold-blooded animals and they couldnt produce enough energy for flight like o...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...terosaurs could supply same energy too. Indeed they did not have problem for flight. ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
Suggestion: lightweight
...atures of these animals shows they were light weight compared to their size. There are hollo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, if, second, so, then, third, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 22.412803532 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 326.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00920245399 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21305997687 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490797546012 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 466.2 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3059679337 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.65 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.42419426049 84% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.