Essay topics: TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task
Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows There are, however, several solutions that responsible businesses can use to prevent injuries to birds.
One-Way Glass
One solution is to replace the regular, clear glass with one-way glass that is transparent in only one direction. The occupants of the building can see out, but birds and others cannot see in. If birds cannot see through a window, they will understand that the glass forms a solid barrier and will not try to fly through it.
Colorful Designs
A second solution is to paint colorful lines or other designs on regular window glass. For example, a window could have a design of thin stripes painted over the glass. People would still be able to see through the openings in the design where there is no paint, while birds would see the stripes and thus avoid trying to fly through the glass Architects can be encouraged to include colorful painted patterns on glass as part of the general design of buildings.
Magnetic Field
The third solution is to create an artificial magnetic held to guide birds away from buildings. Humans use an instrument called a magnetic compass to determine directions-either north, south, east, or west. Bird research has shown that birds have a natural ability to sense Earth’s magnetic fields; this ability works just like a compass, and it helps birds navigate in the right direction when they fly. A building in a bird flight path can be equipped with powerful electromagnets that emit magnetic signals that steer birds in a direction away from the building.
The reading passage explaines that, because of the glasses in the building, there are about 1000000 birds, which are died because they try to go through the glasses as a concrete places and they died. So, the reading claims that there is three specific solution which it will help to reducing of these dead birds. But, on the other hand the lecture absolutely disputes this view and he pictures his view by rejecting of the three reason on the reading.
First, the lecturer claims that the one-way glasses will not help the reducing the casualties of the birds, because this kind of the glasses are incredibly like the mirror from outside and birds can recognize this matter and they try to get through them. Furthermore, they think that the reflexes of the sky and the trees and etc. , which are pictured from outside of the glasses, are real and they will go toward them. So, this policy is as bad as the regular glasses.
Second, in counter of the reading claim the lecture says that the colorful strips will not work either. Because, between the artifactual strips there must be some holes and spaces to let the light go to the indoor of the house and by this spaces, absolutely can not recognize this matter and they will think that these holes are some place for going through like spaces between the leaves of the trees and this police either will not work.
Finally, the lecturer is not convinced that the electromagnets and magnetic field can solve this problem. In the opposite side of the reading claims, the lecturer says that the birds just use their magnetic navigation ability for long distance migration, like for seasonal huge migration from south to north, and they never, ever use this ability for short distances like going to one side of the city to other side.
conclusively, It can be said that the lecture refuses all reasons of the reading passage and he concludes that they are not the correct sentences for this purpose and it is wrong.
- Essay topics: TPO-47 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 70
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing TaskPterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered w 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- independenttpo46 3
- A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see one. In 1768 the animal became ex 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...t the reflexes of the sky and the trees and etc. , which are pictured from outside of th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...flexes of the sky and the trees and etc. , which are pictured from outside of the ...
^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ht go to the indoor of the house and by this spaces, absolutely can not recognize th...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Conclusively
...one side of the city to other side. conclusively, It can be said that the lecture refuse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, so, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 345.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72463768116 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25223705527 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457971014493 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.2074769012 49.2860985944 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.833333333 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.75 21.698381199 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279963793373 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962961668786 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819544488474 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150869801739 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582579397651 0.0443174109184 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 11.0289183223 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.