Do you think English will remain a global language despite globalization? Discuss your views with examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of English as a global language and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the international language is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that English as a power language can be a plus, and I will analyze that through this essay.
From a social standpoint, English as a world language can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the international summit and conferences, as well as the business language, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of the English grammatical structure on students’ education. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both achieving the peace and coexistence apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of the conversation science, The English as a global language might increase the consequences of marketing language. Moreover, fundamental aspects of dominant language would relate to this reality that the demerits of forgetting the native dialect pertain to globalization. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of remaining English as an international language is correlated negatively with endangering the civilization. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the educational language.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of remaining English as a global language far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of broadening our horizon prove the significance of English as a means of communication, but also pinpoint career implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-12 | dingiritennak | 77 | view |
| 2018-08-20 | Sherrysh | 77 | view |
- Migration to cities are increasing and public transport must be developed.s. 88
- For a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 80
- Right amount of motivation and practice can train better than classroom training. What is your opinion? Provide relevant examples. 77
- Some people believe laws change humanbehavior. Do you agree with it? 85
- Right amount of motivation and practice can train better than classroom training. What is your opinion? Provide relevant examples. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67474048443 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42195814351 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59169550173 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2095152271 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.666666667 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244597361907 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817919181535 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634097852589 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144093043868 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456492571597 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.