Should government build more road to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?
The role of government to build more roads to accommodate more vehicles or to increase the network of public transportation sparked heated argument among certain group of people. Many people believe that government should build more roads to accommodate more vehicles. Others reject this notion and claim that improving public transport is the only solution. In my opinion, improving the public transport is the best solution to overcome these problem. This essay would further elaborate both sides with examples and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, one of the most increasing problem in today's world is increase in the number of vehicles on the roads. Critics believe that possessing one's vehicle is the citizen choice and government should take appropriate actions to provide the space for cars on the roads. For example, in Sydney the number of vehicles increased from 20% to 60 % in last decade, to overcome this problem Australian government has taken initiative to build roads and accommodate increased cars on the roads.
On the other hand, there is a debate of arguments going that provide solution to improve public commute services such as increase in buses, trains. Government has to start promoting advantages of public transport and its benefits to society and our environment. It is the only way to reduce traffic congestion on roads. It will not only improve the public transport but also reduces the traffic jam and decrease the environment damage caused poisonous gasses released by vehicles.
Improving public transportation can also help people from all different classes including lower to upper middle class. For example, according to BBC channel, the newly built metro trains in India has reduced traffic problems from 50% to 20%. This example clearly exemplifies us there is a strong correlation between improve in public transportation and traffic jams.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that the benefits of strengthening transportation infrastructure are indeed too good to ignore and further the government has to take step to improve public modes of transport which not only reduces traffic but also decreases the global warming.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-11 | waqasaslam294@mail.com | 77 | view |
| 2018-05-27 | ca hetal | 77 | view |
| 2018-05-27 | ca hetal | 77 | view |
| 2018-05-23 | raminolfati | 85 | view |
| 2018-05-23 | waqasch | 87 | view |
- The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices How far you support this view Give your response with justification 83
- Students with degree earn high salary than who doesn’t have an academic qualification. Therefore, some argue that they have to pay the full cost of their courses. Give your opinion? 86
- Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy. Is it blessing or curse? 77
- "For less developed countries, disadvantages in tourism are greater than advantages". Discuss, give your opinion and examples 72
- When you re at the end of your rope tie a knot and hold on How far do you agree with Theodore Roosevelt quote 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 439, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this problem' or 'these problems'?
Suggestion: this problem; these problems
...nsport is the best solution to overcome these problem. This essay would further elaborate bot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... roads. Critics believe that possessing ones vehicle is the citizen choice and gover...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...poisonous gasses released by vehicles. Improving public transportation can also...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, thus, as to, for example, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 31.9359605911 172% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1207.87684729 156% => OK
No of words: 351.0 242.827586207 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35612535613 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 3.92707691288 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85605055862 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524216524217 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 575.1 379.143842365 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4565960008 50.4703680194 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389289678228 0.242375264174 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128813281164 0.0925447433944 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124384497082 0.071462118173 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205120498041 0.151781067708 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150976777624 0.0609392437508 248% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.