Do you prefer to take a course taught by a professor with whom you have not had classes before or a course taught by a professor whose class you have taken before?
Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
As an inseparable part of each glorious civilizations, education is inextricably intertwined with people's lives. Since all aspects of life are susceptible to the influence of education, individuals must care about this crucial facet of their lives. While nowadays some people subscribe to the view that having courses with professors whom they have had classes before is the most significant pillar of success in education, others look at this concept through a different lens. Be that as it may, many remain neutral and adamantly claim that a myriad of elements should be taken into consideration to prove which belief is closer to reality. To my way of thinking, the more students have classes with unfamiliar professors, the more prosperously they live. So I can say that this statement is the one I can be in agreement with. The following paragraphs will aptly substantiate my conspicuous viewpoints.
This argument is supported by the persuasively stated evidence not just opinion that attending to the classes of various professors is the best policy for achieving zenith of success in education. As a matter of fact, being in the same professor's different courses makes you one-dimensional person. To be more specific, different professors have different fields of specialty, taking courses with unfamiliar professors gives you more chances to get acquainted with a wide assortment of subject matters. As a case in point, I vividly remember, when I was attending the University of Tehran, despite my friends, taking courses with unfamiliar professors is my first priority. All my friends thought that it was a ridiculous approach, owing to the fact that they opted for same professors for various classes, therefore, they were familiar with him/her way of training. Notwithstanding, I strongly kept up with my opinion, and after graduation, they were really jealous of me, due to the fact that I decisively could think differently. In other words, attending in classes with different professors allowed me to gain a wide variegated of perspectives in order to broaden my horizons. Therefore, my personal experience competently corroborates the fact that taking different classes with various professors obviously provides benefit, albeit difficult at times.
By the same token, one should regard another subtle point meticulously that in addition to expanding the breadth of mind, people can have more fortune to disclosure their great capabilities and strengthens in a profusion of subjects to more tutors by attending classes with different professors, which fosters the extension of job opportunities is its crowning achievement. In fact, in this day and age most companies with various fields of specialty are in close connection with some university’s professors, so attending classes with diverse professors could be a promising step for accessing to a spread-spectrum of job situations. Let's go back ten years ago when my brother graduated from the University of Tehran, after graduation he went to visit some of his professors and surprisingly they proposed him different job opportunities, and he was so excited, since he never thought he could find a decent job in this critical situation of unemployment in the country. Hence, this concrete experience shed some light on the viewpoint that taking courses taught by a professor with whom you had not classes before, not only provides you more chances to shine brilliantly at classes of different professors, but also gives you more job opportunities in the near future.
By and large, according to the above-mentioned reasons, I vehemently agree with this standpoint that attending classes with different professors is the best option. Now the inevitable question is why most of the students prefer taking courses taught by familiar professors yet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-05 | porteghale Abiasli | 76 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | usef | 76 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | Qq99 | 88 | view |
| 2020-11-30 | mahi22 | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-18 | ArashAlirezaei | 66 | view |
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most people can solve important problems in their lives by themselves or with the help of their families Help from the government is unnecessary 90
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 80
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b 81
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 640, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...to a spread-spectrum of job situations. Lets go back ten years ago when my brother g...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, may, really, so, then, therefore, while, in addition, in fact, as a matter of fact, by and large, in other words, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 102.0 52.1666666667 196% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3224.0 1977.66487455 163% => OK
No of words: 602.0 407.700716846 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35548172757 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95335121839 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14318022122 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 297.0 212.727598566 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493355481728 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 992.7 618.680645161 160% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.4742360455 48.9658058833 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.523809524 100.406767564 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 20.6045352989 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90476190476 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320941863119 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100798481235 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918776167189 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209645843948 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265631910585 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 11.7677419355 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 156.0 86.8835125448 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.