Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere.
To what extent do you agree with this view?
Society with a heritage have been long considered as sophisticated and advanced. However, the recent financial crisis of the lavishness and expense should be questioned. Tax payers money has to be spent more practically rather than on cultural endeavours. Firstly not everyone appreciates arts I'm the society. Secondly, the employment has to be precedenced.
Art is any form that brings quality into one's life, if interested. Amongst art lovers, technically there are many minorities and other activities such as sports are more popular. Take football as an example, across the globe there are so many people who are watching the matches in the stadium than looking at the sculptures or art. This fact makes it look impossible to say art is bringing quality into one's life.
Secondly, the resources diverted to such projects comes from public and should be spent in a way that benefits them. Commission and purchasing art is an insult to the tax payers who endure poor high unemployment such as those in Newcastle, UN. This city suffers from high unemployment yet council commissioned a large sculpture called 'Angel of the North'. Financing a job creation project would undoubtedly have been more practical for local community.
To conclude, I believe it is an unjust affirmation that art brings quality into one's life that the money should be spent elsewhere. This is because art benefits only for a small minority and secondly the expense included should benefit the majority. In the future, governments will recognise that quality in one's life derives from decent opportunity in life, not a sculpture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-24 | Anamia | 56 | view |
| 2018-10-19 | ansgusn | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-06 | Prince gill | 89 | view |
| 2018-09-06 | Prince gill | 67 | view |
| 2018-06-04 | Harshani | 86 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
.... Firstly not everyone appreciates arts Im the society. Secondly, the employment h...
^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...rt is any form that brings quality into ones life, if interested. Amongst art lovers...
^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ble to say art is bringing quality into ones life. Secondly, the resources divert...
^^^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...public and should be spent in a way that benefits them. Commission and purchasing...
^^
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cal for local community. To conclude, I believe it is an unjust affirmation th...
^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ffirmation that art brings quality into ones life that the money should be spent els...
^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ernments will recognise that quality in ones life derives from decent opportunity in...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1877394636 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82456826349 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7689475607 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.625 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4375 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186351107851 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581147430412 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434317778796 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112256328056 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364942562822 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.