Graph presentation
Below bar graph and line graph provide the brief analysis of money spent on fast food on weekly basis. According to the three income groups provided, it may observe that high-income group is spending more money on pizza as compared to average income and low-income group. Average income-group pay more for pizza as compare to low-income group. Secondly, fish and chips are purchased more in average income-group. As far as hamburgers are concerned, money is spent in descending order from high to low respectively. As per the trend graph, it may analyze that hamburgers consumption has been increased from 100 to 400 grammes after 1985 whereas pizza consumption has not increased as quickly as hamburger raised. Furthermore, it may observe that fish and chips consumption has been declined since 1970 to 1985.
To sum up, people spend more money to purchase the hamburgers in different income groups and food consumption is also high for hamburgers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-06 | Jessica Nadal | 73 | view |
| 2018-05-11 | shahsm75 | 61 | view |
- Question- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods. 61
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods. 61
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. 73
- Graph presentation 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 560, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'hamburgers'' or 'hamburger's'?
Suggestion: hamburgers'; hamburger's
...er the trend graph, it may analyze that hamburgers consumption has been increased from 100...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16129032258 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82462782903 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574193548387 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8337994462 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.069442150566 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373672197054 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737751288578 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.040059738638 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040059738638 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.