Some countries focus on health care and education benefits while others on infrastructure and employment. Which do you think would be more beneficial for the population? Give specific details and examples to support your opinion.
Righteous fund allocations to public sectors are prerequisite to the overall development of a nation. While a few nations are inclined more specifically towards health services and education sector expansion, however, other countries argue that laying down modern infrastructure and ample job opportunities are most important for the masses. In my personal view, thus balanced approach makes for a more positive outcome in favour of progress of the country.
The government of the country should start with laying foundation of education and health care facilities in a nation. The most prominent view in support of my opinion is removal of illiteracy in second and third world countries. Especially, rural areas tend to lack basic edcuation and health care facilities. For Instance, deadly diseases Malaria and Chicken pox are highly prevalent in Asian and African countries where WHO(World health organisation) has been working in collaboration with governments to raise their health and safety levels. Finally, education is of utmost importance for a nation to thrive on self-sufficient approach with imparting the skills and qualities among native people for upcoming government projects in the country.
Granted, creation of numerous employment opportunities are prerequisite to the educated society in order to retain the competent workforce in a nation. Further, reduction in crime rate and stabilisation of peace and harmony among people are positive outcomes of employment sector developments. Apart from it, Infrastructure development would catalyse the communication and travel enhancement among the people, which in turn, help them to maintain healthy work life balance. To exemplify, bullet train in Japan have enormously contributed to working community travelling hundreds of miles for work on daily basis on the contrary of permanent migration.
To sum up, based on aforementioned facts it can be concluded that every nation should work towards making of judicious decisions in interlinked public sector developments. Nevertheless, absence of them would serve as a deterrent to all round development taking place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-01 | Jaswinder Singh Brar | 77 | view |
- Some countries focus on health care and education benefits while others on infrastructure and employment. Which do you think would be more beneficial for the population? Give specific details and examples to support your opinion. 84
- Some countries focus on health care and education benefits while others on infrastructure and employment Which do you think would be more beneficial for the population Give specific details and examples to support your opinion 77
- write a letter to your boss apologizing for the recent meeting you missed at work.1. Apologise for missing the meeting2.explain what happened3.say what you will do to compensate 96
- You are applying for a job and need a letter of reference.Write a letter to formal teacher. In your letter :Give detail of the jobExplain why it is important to youSuggest what information your teacher could out in the reference. 78
- The impact that growing demand for more flights has had on the environment isa major concern for many countries. Some people believe that one way to limitthe number of people traveling by air is to increase taxes on flights.To what extent do you think thi 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...structure development would catalyse the communication and travel enhancement amo...
^^
Line 5, column 560, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rmously contributed to working community travelling hundreds of miles for work on...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, thus, while, apart from, for instance, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69905956113 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14310497636 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614420062696 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0764189602 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.857142857 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189302966498 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577989951048 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050533516441 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101710236581 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559113843991 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.