A recent study has shown that over 50% of school children cannot write legibly. The researchers concluded that the widespread use of smartphones, tablets and computers by children from as young as 12 months old was to blame. We are now living in a “post-paper” world where people are connected to one device or another at all times.
Should schools stop teaching handwriting entirely and focus instead on their typing skills? Is handwriting no longer relevant?
In today’s technological era, there is much debate on whether children should focus on handwriting or typing skills. Some people believe that school should stop teaching handwriting entirely as it is no longer relevant. While others argue that handwriting is more helpful to learn basic things and later this skill help them to earn well. I am inclined to believe that school should focus on children’s handwriting even though typing skills have become essential these days. This essay will discuss the importance of handwriting and lead to a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, handwriting is a basic tool which school should teach to every child as it is used in many subjects like taking notes, taking tests and doing classroom works and homework for almost every content area. And handwriting plays a vital role in their academic performance where poor handwriting can have a pervasive effect on their school performance. For example, when children learn how to write letter “m”, they can learn its sound and attention to linkage among handwriting, reading and spelling skills.
To continue with, good handwriting help children in their jobs as well because there are many companies which take written tests before conducting a personal interview. Companies also hire handwriting analysts to judge a person and guess their qualities on basis of their letter formation and neatness of text and good handwriting people get the more benefits. For instance, my sister won the State level writing competition when she was in school because of her writing skills and now she is one of the writing analysts. So, teaching handwriting can open career opportunity for children.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that although typing skills help children in today’s technological era to survive still good handwriting help them to improve their performance and develop their brain.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-08 | Manisha Verma | 85 | view |
| 2018-06-08 | Manisha Verma | 77 | view |
| 2018-06-08 | Manisha Verma | 77 | view |
| 2018-06-08 | Manisha Verma | 77 | view |
| 2018-06-08 | sunil803 | 77 | view |
- A recent study has shown that over 50% of school children cannot write legibly. The researchers concluded that the widespread use of smartphones, tablets and computers by children from as young as 12 months old was to blame. We are now living in a “post 77
- The mass media, including TV, radio and newspapers, have great influence in shaping people’s ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 464, Rule ID: ESSENTIAL_ESSENTIALLY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'essentially'?
Suggestion: essentially
...g even though typing skills have become essential these days. This essay will discuss the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and lead to a plausible conclusion. To commence with, handwriting is a basic...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...riting, reading and spelling skills. To continue with, good handwriting help ...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pen career opportunity for children. In conclusion, the foregoing discussion ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 303.0 242.827586207 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44224422442 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86786336596 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577557755776 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0701352573 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.846153846 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114437148348 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477052306647 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037655118609 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0756615586973 0.151781067708 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0156340670786 0.0609392437508 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.