The pie charts below give information about world population in 1900 and 2000.
The given charts illustrate some striking differences of world population between 1900 and 2000.
Looking at the reports, it is immediately obvious that the population rate of Asia was the largest in both years. Also, there was a decided upward trend in Africa and Latin America population, while the opposite trend was true in Europe and Asia.
As can be seen from the first chart, in 1900, the percentage of people living in Asia took the lion's share of the pie, at 60%, which was 35% higher than that in Europe. North America and Africa made up insignificant parts of world population, with the rate of 5% and 4% respectively. Latin America and the remaining regions (Others) shared the same part of the pie, at 3%, which was the lowest rate in 1900.
Turning to the second chart, in 2000, Asia saw a marginal drop to 54% in population structure, but the rate remained the highest in total. Similarly, the allocation of Europe decreased by 11% in 100 years. However, the proportion of those living Latin America and Africa experienced a significant rise to 8% and 10% in turn. There was no change in the population pattern of North America and Others (remaining at 5% and 3% in succession. Noticeably, an additional category, namely Middle East and North America, was recorded in the same year, with a 6% population rate.
- University should accept equal number of male and female students in every subject. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland, divided into three categories, from 1995 – 2004. 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland, divided into three categories, from 1995 – 2004. 61
- The table below shows the number of medals won by the top ten countries in the London 2012 Olympic Games.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in millions of telephone calls in Finland divided into three categories from 1995 2004 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... years. Also, there was a decided upward trend in Africa and Latin America popula...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78695652174 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65298989586 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55652173913 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.4391638006 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.090909091 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179996334522 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771581133082 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873615867207 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144021558252 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106533099184 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.