Two provided charts demonstrate the distance of route on a monthly basis and the allocation of mean of transportation used by Britain inhabitants during the period from 1990 to 2010.
Two provided charts demonstrate the distance of route on a monthly basis and the allocation of mean of transportation used by Britain inhabitants during the period from 1990 to 2010.
A glance at the given charts reveals that in UK, people traveled mostly for commuting purposes. It is also evident that automobile was the well-enjoyed type of vehicles.
Clearly, the number of kilometers for travelling to and from work in 1990 was approximately 6500 kilometers, which exceeded absolutely the figure for delivery and personal aims. Afterwards, it reached a plateau at a negligible 8000 kilometers in the middle of 1995 prior to an exponential decline to 6000 kilometers in some last months of 2010. Besides, both the data for transport and personal intention suffered from a marginally fluctuation, hovering a mere 2000 kilometers and 3250 kilometers, respectively.
It is apparent from the information supplied that the percentage of using of cars was overwhelming from 63% to 59% through the shown duration, which was doubled the rate of truck in 2010. In stark contrast, the proportion of bus, motor and others were quite low that stayed under 6%.
- The bar chart demonstrates the number of Olympic blazons gained by several countries in Asia, Europe and Americas. 73
- The line graph demonstrates how the percentage of British families that owned different number of cars oscillated between 1971 and 2007. 78
- Writing task 1: TABLE – Using phone 78
- A horizontal city or a vertical city 82
- School uniforms should be abolished in all schools 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('marginally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fluctuation') instead of another adjective.
...rt and personal intention suffered from a marginally fluctuation, hovering a mere 2000 kilometers and 32...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20855614973 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04432636515 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631016042781 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5572539883 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.75 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367648471834 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162620181682 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.3180329932 0.0843802449381 377% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298981204518 0.15604864568 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.405425453599 0.0819641961636 495% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.