Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is a waste of money for government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
Human being is a curious creature, tha is why since dawn of the humanity he is searching for the origion of himself. In this regard, we wittness a numerous paintings on the wall of the caves which belong to milion years ago. Considering these facts, I am on the opinion that investing on space researches in pivotal and should be supported bu the governments. In the following paragraphs, I will elucidate my most convincing reasons.
First and foremost, It is crystal clear that we can exercise space in adavntageous ways. It this regard, we can mention satelites that ficilated data transmition to all around the world. It is beyond doubt that some pivotal technology eased our life ensue from satelites like Inthernet, TV, Radio, to name but a handful. Locating of satelites needs a percise research on the space, they have to scrutinize all the aspects like the distance from earh, the mass, the materials that are used in manufacturing. Besides, In my opinion, we can use the space as a place for nuclear wastes. Nowadays, these wastes are one of the big concerns, due to their detrimental and fatal affects on the enviromental and humans. Radio active wastes are conducive to disease like cancer. Moreover, it can change the structure of the soil and diminish its fertility. Condusively, it can damage the ecosystem and bring some irrepreable damages. So due to its beneficial utelization, we have to invest on space exploration as much as it is possible.
Having discussed the isue from previous points of view, I want to focus on the subject from another perspective. It is beyond doubt that the earth have been going to be devoide of fuel in milion years. At first it may seem as a long period but from historical point of veiw it is as long as a blink of eye. Therefore, not only we should protect our earth, but also we have to find a new planet the we can live in after such catastrophic disasters. For instance, the earth is facing with meteor showers more and more. The last time, I heard a new about a bulky meteor that has the possiblity to attack our planet. These meteors that are able to pass our atomesphere and reach the land have bulky mass. It means that, they can be a big threat for humans and desimate the earth. Besides, as I mentioned before, we are facing with decreasing of fuel and other detrimental impacts that lead us for second place to live. So it is a righteous idea to find an other planet that has the similar properties with our planet to supports living. Tu put in a nutshell, it is pivotal to search as much as possible in the space to tackle the mentioned problems.
Taking all the above mentioned assertion in to consideration, we can conclude that we need space exploration more and more. Not only do we can utelize it in a propper way, but also it will provide a second place to live on, in order to find a remedy for some crucial problems in the future. Therefore, all these researches requires the strict supports of the governments and their funding.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-15 | hamiddelbari | 90 | view |
| 2019-08-05 | negar.sh | 76 | view |
| 2019-05-08 | aliasghar | 76 | view |
| 2019-02-15 | persepolistmm | 70 | view |
| 2018-10-22 | SHAHRIYAR | 70 | view |
- For schools, assessing teacher’s teaching efficiency is a verry important issue. But is it better for other techears to assess or let students assess teachers? 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is a waste of money for government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 73
- It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is a waste of money for government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 76
- For schools, assessing teacher’s teaching efficiency is a verry important issue. But is it better for other techears to assess or let students assess teachers? 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'painting'?
Suggestion: painting
... In this regard, we wittness a numerous paintings on the wall of the caves which belong t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 395, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'we'?
Suggestion: the; we
..., but also we have to find a new planet the we can live in after such catastrophic dis...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 950, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
...live. So it is a righteous idea to find an other planet that has the similar properties ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2475.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 534.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63483146067 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69023704 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498127340824 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 791.1 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 22.0 9.59856630824 229% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5592409322 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3928571429 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119612537571 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332737057211 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309047425571 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789034904994 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0103947890489 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.