Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults.
Discuss both these views and and give your own opinion.
Some people believe that children should grow up in a competitive environment in order to be successful in future adult life. Others believe that they should learn the value of co-operation to work effectively in future. I believe that children can develop better and become efficient if they imbibe co-operation.
Competition does provide an impetus to child's development. A healthy competing situation can motivate children to improve their performance. It also boost creativity, hard work and instills a sense of accomplishment in them. A good example of this can be seen when child competes in individual sports competition such as, swimming. However, competition can also have a detrimental effect on child's psychology. The failure to achieve desired result may lead to a sense of loss and can lead to depression. Depending on the experience, the child may develop into a confident adult or a dejected adult with lack of confidence in his abilities.
Co-operation, on the other hand, can prove to be better quality to be developed in children. When children are taught to co-operate with their friends and peers, they learn quality of team-work, which in future is valuable to contribute to society. they also learn to understand and empathize with different perspectives of their classmates. It can also push them to focus more on productivity of task rather than just finishing it in order to win a competition. For instance, in absence of competition, while working on a science project, children can effectively work with other students by exchanging ideas and learn from the project rather than just making it to secure prize in competition.
The qualities of team work, respecting different viewpoints, empathy and productivity are very important to work in adult life and therefore, learning to co-operate can help children to develop these qualities.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- “Fatherhood ought to be emphasized as much as motherhood”. The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not to have babies leads on to the idea that they are also responsible for bringing the children up.-Syerapke- (rewrite) 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 78
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- “Fatherhood ought to be emphasized as much as motherhood”. The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not to have babies leads on to the idea that they are also responsible for bringing the children up. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...lue of co-operation to work effectively in future. I believe that children can develop be...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'boosts'?
Suggestion: boosts
...n to improve their performance. It also boost creativity, hard work and instills a se...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...e is valuable to contribute to society. they also learn to understand and empathize ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28523489933 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0974754007 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553691275168 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3029679799 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4375 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244198490671 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854718631595 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637819221286 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161145077382 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081411071028 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.