The Diagrams below show the stages in the development of simple cooking equipment?
The three diagrams reveal the information about the development of cooking device. It is clearly and coherently represented.
Overall, it is evident that there are three distinct stages in the process, from the begin simple fire to eventually more complex devices.
It is crystal clear from the diagram, there are different stages in the process. However, at the first stage in the development of cooking euipment, there is simple cooking pot balanced on three stones over a fire the wood or grass. The second diagram shows the how the same equipment is used by building a shield which is made of clay around the fire. This clay shield is used to protect the fire from wind.
At the final stage in the development of cooking device, there are eight things which are used. The fire has completely inclosed by a metal for the purpose of protection. Furthermore, the door at the front which air can be enter and ash can be removed. Moreover, the handle has helped for easy transportation. In addition to this, it has been inside the lining which is made of clay. It has also three support for pot. Futhermore, charcoal is used as fuel which is burnt on the grate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-03 | Manpreetgill | 73 | view |
- The Diagrams below show the stages in the development of simple cooking equipment? 73
- The table below gives information about favorite pastime in different countries in percentage 59
- Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking?Fast food vs. Sitdown restaurant? 61
- The table below gives information about favorite pastime in different countries in percentage? 78
- The following graph and pie chart shows the sales of a company in the first and the second quarter of the year.(percentage) 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 82, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ee distinct stages in the process, from the begin simple fire to eventually more complex ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...wood or grass. The second diagram shows the how the same equipment is used by building ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71568627451 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55972488069 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.018238621 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.7142857143 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5714285714 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277480751767 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805990409621 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989573685867 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169375251057 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938643536496 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.5 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.