Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals and homemade food in years 1970 1980 1990 and 2000.
The presented circular representation depicts the proportion of total food budget expenditure on restaurant meals and homemade, whereas the linear graph reveals the information about the meals of fast food and sitdown restaurant during the time period of 1970 to 2000. Collaboration of data was done in per centum, which is clearly and coherently represented.
Overall, it is evident that amongst the four years, home cooking made up of the largest expenditure, restaurant meals represented the lowest in the given time period, while the total number of meals of fast food meals rapidly went up till 2000 as compared to sitdown restaurant meals.
A glance at the four pie charts, there were a slight difference in percentile of restaurant meals which occupied the 10% and 15% respectively in both years 1970 and 1980. The half amount spent on restaurant food and home cooking had same profile in year 2000.
On the other hand, the number of meals of fast food meals started from 20% in year 1970 and then upsurged to near about 30% in year 1980. In the following years, the number of meals were dramatically shot up from 30% to 85% and reached the highest peak in year 2000. Furthermore, the number of meals had been same percentage as a fast food meals, then slight grew above a half quarter in 1980 and ended upto less than 50% in year 2000 with sharp increment.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2000. 50
- The bar chart below show the marriage and divorce statistics for nine countries in 1981 and 1984 78
- The chart below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2002 96
- The graphs below show the weekly earnings of men and women in Euros for the 16-59 age groups as per their education level. 78
- The graphs below show the weekly earnings of men and women in Euros for the 16-59 age groups as per their education level. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82203389831 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60999063882 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525423728814 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.761647773 43.030603864 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.25 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.463292801215 0.215688989381 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202212607965 0.103423049105 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102877174427 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282235080901 0.15604864568 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523790504863 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.