Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with the station's coverage of weather and local news. In addition, several local businesses that used to run advertisements during our late-night news program have just cancelled their advertising contracts with us. Therefore, in order to attract more viewers to our news programs and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues, we should expand the coverage of weather and local news on all our news programs."
The argument claims that the late-night news program has devoted to increase time to national news and less to local and wheather news so, there are many complaints received. And also there are many businesses left with contract. So attract the viewers and gain profit news channel should restore to time devoted to wheather and local news. Stated in this way the argument fails to mentions saveral critical points basis on which it could be evaluated. The conclusion relies on an assumption there are no better evidence so, the conclusion can be unsubstantiated. However, careful scrutiny of the evidence reveals little credible support for the author's conclusion.
First of all, The argument said that the there are more complaints received from the viewers were concerned with the company coverage of weather and local news. This is merely an assumption without much solid ground. For example here argument does not demonstrate how many complain received. How many people likes more weather and local news. Here, the argument provide some statistical data than this claim hold, but there is no ratio of people who like local news, wheather to national news.
Second, The argument readily assumes that the local businesses that uses advertise during late-night news program they have canceled advertising contracts. This is again weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not provide correlation between local news and local businesses advertise. Here the argument implicitly assume that there is a some problem with those businesses with the local news, but there is no provide its evidence. So it is not plausible as it states. If the argument lot more convincing if it was stated that local news affect the those businesses like in local news view some complaints again those company than probably these company canceled program with news channel.
Lastly, the argument claims that the in order to attract more viewers to the program and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues news channel should restore the time devoted to wheather and local news rather than national news. This is again very weak argument. Here, the argument readily assume that the if he provide its formal news than many people happy with wheather and local news, but what about those people who like to watch national news ? Consequently, those people who likes national news they are left to watch the news of this channel. Again argument assume that news channel viewer are less because of national news if they are show weather news than people are attract more as compare to past situation. It is not true most probably because people who like national news they are not able to watch so those are left with bad impression of the news channel.
In conclusion, The author's argument unpersuasive as its stands. To bolster it further the author must provide better concrete evidence. It could be considerablt strengthed if author mentions all relavant facts. In order to asses the merit of critical situation it is essential to have a depth knowledge about contributing factors. As a result the author's conclusion has a no legs to stand.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-31 | tomlee0205 | 78 | view |
2023-08-27 | yirtusemla | 50 | view |
2023-08-19 | riyarmy | 58 | view |
2023-07-30 | aryaman | 58 | view |
2023-07-27 | searchinglife06 | 66 | view |
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another 65
- Computers is the result of the technology advancement and computers are the part of the our daily routine. 61
- "In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries." 16
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: grades encourage students to learn. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 67
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: The argument claims that the late-night news program has devoted to increase time to national news and less to local and wheather news so, there are many complaints received.
Error: wheather Suggestion: whether
Sentence: So attract the viewers and gain profit news channel should restore to time devoted to wheather and local news.
Error: wheather Suggestion: whether
Sentence: Stated in this way the argument fails to mentions saveral critical points basis on which it could be evaluated.
Error: saveral Suggestion: several
Sentence: Here, the argument provide some statistical data than this claim hold, but there is no ratio of people who like local news, wheather to national news.
Error: wheather Suggestion: whether
Sentence: Lastly, the argument claims that the in order to attract more viewers to the program and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues news channel should restore the time devoted to wheather and local news rather than national news.
Error: wheather Suggestion: whether
Sentence: Here, the argument readily assume that the if he provide its formal news than many people happy with wheather and local news, but what about those people who like to watch national news ?
Error: wheather Suggestion: whether
Sentence: It could be considerablt strengthed if author mentions all relavant facts.
Error: relavant Suggestion: relevant
Error: strengthed Suggestion: strengthen
Error: considerablt Suggestion: considerable
----------------------
flaws:
you have issues on how to argue. though you know where to argue. compare a sample:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/over-past-year-our…
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 9 2
No. of Sentences: 27 15
No. of Words: 516 350
No. of Characters: 2574 1500
No. of Different Words: 200 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.766 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.988 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.454 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 183 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 146 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 95 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 42 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.111 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.243 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.741 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.342 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.524 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.125 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Thank you for your suggestion
Thank you for your suggestion, I hope It will help me in actual test.
hey, I got the same score
hey, I got the same score that you give me, i got 3.0 in AWA in actual GRE, you are accurate in giving score. Thank you for great help.
Thank you for the feedback.
Thank you for the feedback. Really appreciated. Good luck and have a great day!
Cheers,
testbig support team
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 383, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'mention'.
Suggestion: mention
...tated in this way the argument fails to mentions saveral critical points basis on which ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 647, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...reveals little credible support for the authors conclusion. First of all, The argume...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it was stated that local news affect the those businesses like in local news view...
^^
Line 5, column 621, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this company' or 'those companies'?
Suggestion: this company; those companies
...n local news view some complaints again those company than probably these company canceled pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 649, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this company' or 'these companies'?
Suggestion: this company; these companies
...aints again those company than probably these company canceled program with news channel. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 321, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'provides'.
Suggestion: provides
... argument readily assume that the if he provide its formal news than many people happy ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 700, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ather news than people are attract more as compare to past situation. It is not tr...
^^
Line 9, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...the news channel. In conclusion, The authors argument unpersuasive as its stands. To...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 332, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...h knowledge about contributing factors. As a result the authors conclusion has a n...
^^
Line 9, column 348, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...t contributing factors. As a result the authors conclusion has a no legs to stand.
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hors conclusion has a no legs to stand.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, lastly, second, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 28.8173652695 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 55.5748502994 94% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 16.3942115768 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2628.0 2260.96107784 116% => OK
No of words: 516.0 441.139720559 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09302325581 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.56307096286 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51170949899 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 204.123752495 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.387596899225 0.468620217663 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 819.9 705.55239521 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 19.7664670659 137% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.8782665785 57.8364921388 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 119.503703932 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 23.324526521 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.37037037037 5.70786347227 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.25449101796 209% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 6.88822355289 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371908517639 0.218282227539 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113474694989 0.0743258471296 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126676026942 0.0701772020484 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216961403382 0.128457276422 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113770558922 0.0628817314937 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.3799401198 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.32208582834 90% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 98.500998004 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.