Is it better to move around or to stay in one place?

The issue of staying at home or go around is completely individual, as far as I concerned. Some people are of the opinion that hanging around, wandering in city streets, etc. is so exciting but ironically, some other are people completely disagree with this view and prefer to stay at home. To me, it is important and necessary to go around because of some obvious reasons like getting involved in society, visit some new places or some nostalgic ones and enjoy walking through people and talk to them about different subjects. But here comes the point that our society is not completely suitable for all age levels. Thus, were I to choose, I would prefer moving around at anytime and everywhere.

In the first stage, I strongly believe that moving around will bring you some unique chances to see some new places. For example, imagine that you are student in a foreign country like Italy. As a result, no one can accept that you live in Rome and do not visit the Coliseum! Neither, it is almost completely unbelievable that you never had visited Venice. Visiting new places, either natural ones or ancient ones, will make you experienced and besides enjoying at the time you will achieve some other new memories for your future life to recall and enjoy.

Subsequently, going around lets you involve with the society you live in and helps you learn some new experiences through new happenings that occur every day in your city. It is true that you can trace news on internet, radio or newspaper but I think at least you have to see and feel some unlettered daily life experiences with your own eyes. In addition, one can enjoy talking with new people in the town and propose different subjects to argue even in the bus station, metro or markets. I believe that human beings are a social creature and need to communicate with each other directly to satisfy some of their innate needs.

Ironically, going around, which has some good advantages in my opinion, might be even harmful especially for school children because of unsafe atmosphere of the society and easy to defraud mind of theirs. Therefore, although I greatly suggest that children should try their independence, but maybe under supervision of family this task results in a better outcome and we can easily give them their own freedom while we are directing them to the best route of life.

Generally, taking all the reasons above into account, it is barely too arbitrary to conclude that staying at home has some advantages relative to go around and enjoy other places. No denying not only going around makes you enjoy your leisure time, but also helps you learn some new different valuable experiences. But one should not neglect bad effects of the society, which could be prevented under right supervision of families, on a specific age level of people like school children. At last, are you agree with me to go around and have a nice walk?