the animals have no place in the 21 century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. to what extent do you agree or disagree
Some people believe that it useless that we spending money on protecting wild animals because we do not need them. I completely disagree with this idea and in the following, I will discuss that.
These days, humans are exploiting or destroying every square meter of lands for food or accommodation, so some people believe that in the 21st century we do not need them and it is not the important issue if they are dying out. Also, because of destroying their habitats, wild animals do not have enough space to live or place that they feed themselves. In addition to this, destroying the habitats leads interrupt the natural cycles and devastated food chains. In consequence, some species will be extinct and disappear.
In my opinion, the planet Earth is for every species and we do not have the right to destroy the habitat of other species. Also, we should aware about the significance of their playing role in our life. For example, plants produce oxygen and absorb the carbon dioxide and make the climate stable for us. In addition to this, some animals help us for treatment of some disease, so we need to allocate enough fund to conserve and protect them. In consequence, we maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth.
In conclusion, we are part of the natural cycles so, destroying another part effect on our life. All of us should be trying to protect the natural habitat because we are responsible for the next generation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | Shivam7090 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | ppatel | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Sukhwant Singh | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | mohammad.iraf | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | mohammad.iraf | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...species will be extinct and disappear. In my opinion, the planet Earth is for eve...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... natural balance of all life on Earth. In conclusion, we are part of the natural ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1194.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.776 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57496873767 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 376.2 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4866842015 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8461538462 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137356679799 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498835080214 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512438391233 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945208286058 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341325356886 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.