The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The given pie charts demonstrate the percentage of English students in a university of England who can speak different languages other than English in the year 2000 and 2010.
Firstly, in 2000 the students speaking only English were 20% but this number got declined in the year 2010 almost halved. Secondly, the students speaking English with German were almost same in both the years. However, the French language was known by 15% of students in 2000 which decreased to 10% by 2010.
Moreover, the Spanish language was known by 30% of the students in 2000 which was later increased to 35% by 2010. There was increase in the proportion of students who knew other language different from above mentioned by 5%. 15% of students knew more than one different language in 2010.
All in all, we may say that students in university prefer languages other than English. There was increase in the Spanish speaking people in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-27 | abishek_dhakal | view | |
| 2023-01-07 | Behnaz.babayani | 70 | view |
| 2021-06-11 | baljit12 | 77 | view |
- The charts below show the growth in the population in some of the world s largest cities as well as the population distribution in urban and rural areas 75
- The two pie charts below show changes in world population by region between 1900 and 2000 Summarise the information by choosing and reporting the key features and make any relevant comparisons 74
- The pie graphs below show the results of a survey of children's activities. The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in, whereas the second graph shows the activities in which girls participate. 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 61
- People today move to new cities or new countries more than ever before What challenges do they experiences What strategies are there to meet these challenges 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in 2000 which decreased to 10% by 2010. Moreover, the Spanish language was known...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89808917197 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45251880167 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503184713376 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8836332137 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4444444444 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42411740545 0.215688989381 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18975968044 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834357027098 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282540700226 0.15604864568 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759061039089 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.79 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.