The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries.

Essay topics:

The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries.

The tabular charts illustrate the sales of fairtrade labelled different two things such as tea and pineapples by various countries between 2010 and 2015.The data calibrated in millions of euros.
Have a look on the sales of fairtrade labelled tea, 2.8 euros spent by the Germany on this thing in 2010 whereas, in the further year, it was 2 points bigger than the former. There was a 2.5 million of euros utilised by the France in initially time however, in the next year, sale of tea inclined near around a one in twenty millions euros. In case of Australia, Netherlands almost same with the difference of 2 million euros in 2010 while, in last year, former one doubled and the latter one reached on 2.7 million euros in last year.
Moving to the other chart into consideration, three fold sale of pineapples witnessed in 2015 before upsurging this was recorded only 16 million euros with in the time period of five years on the other hand, France, Germany, these kept on 2 , 3 million euros but the first was increase with 3.5 million and the second place was lesser than with 1.1 million as compare to the former year.other countries were negligible.
Overall, the larger proportion of money consumed on tea by France on the another side, Australia was giving more preference to the pineapples.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-07-24 sandee 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...various countries between 2010 and 2015.The data calibrated in millions of euros. ...
^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...os with in the time period of five years on the other hand, France, Germany, thes...
^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r hand, France, Germany, these kept on 2 , 3 million euros but the first was incre...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, second, whereas, while, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1074.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77333333333 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53383401685 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564444444444 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.4673145484 43.030603864 217% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 179.0 112.824112599 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.5 22.9334400587 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 5.23603664747 258% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170138198517 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105289353242 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760129431457 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121680834779 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717513116195 0.0819641961636 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.2329268293 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.