how to control population of cane toad
The text is discussing possible ways to control large and uncontrollable population of cane toad which is a big threat for small native animals in Australia, and provides some reasons to support claimed possible ways. On the other hand, the professor provides contradicting reasons and says why she is against claimed reasons of the text.
First, the text claims that by using a native fence which blocks and limits the spread of cane toad to whole Australia we can control their population and spread, and explains that because this method was useful when first used in twentieth century, can be practical now too. The professor refutes this claim, and says that some of young cane toad and those of them which are still as egg, can be spread by rivers and streams and establish a new colony where ever the water may carry them. She states that we cannot limit all rivers and streams, and that is why we cannot block the population of these species by using national fence.
Second, the text states that we can ask volunteers to capture cane toads and because they can be found easily, volunteers can do this and if the government set a group of volunteers to do this act, we can easily control the population of cane toad. The professor goes against this claim and says that this method could be practical but volunteers may destroy native species of the Australia, and if we use this method, one specific frog which is really like cane toad, especially when it is young, will be in a big danger.
Third, the text claims that scientists by spreading a disease-causing virus can control the number of cane toad and although this virus may infect some other spices like reptile and amphibian, but will not harm them, and is a safe method for controlling cane toad. The professor casts doubt on this point and rejects it by saying that this idea is really bad, and will have bad consequences in habitats of these species. She also states that reptiles and amphibians which are native animals of South America are transported to other areas and if they reach to south America, can destroy native population of these species.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-26 | nastaran1992 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and ex 73
- long distance migration of humpbacks, and provides three reasons of support why it believes they use stars as a tool of navigation. 71
- it is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect you daily life 73
- Anting in birds and some possible benefits of it. 73
- online and traditional encyclopedias 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the young') or simply say ''some young''.
Suggestion: some of the young; some young
...essor refutes this claim, and says that some of young cane toad and those of them which are s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, really, second, so, still, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 5.04856512141 357% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 25.0 7.30242825607 342% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 22.412803532 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 371.0 270.72406181 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75202156334 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44602889883 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463611859838 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 527.4 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.51434878587 528% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 21.2450331126 174% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.0697654037 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.3 110.228320801 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.1 21.698381199 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262983114606 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117423476242 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964700438616 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186253348391 0.162205337803 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015840863679 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.3589403974 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.0289183223 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.498013245 160% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.2008830022 179% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.