The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tonnes, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007.
The line graph indicates how much acid rain was released by four different industries over 17 years in England.
Overall, it is clear from the chart that the total amount of acid rain fell substaintially in that period. Particularly, emissions from electricity, gas and water supply, which represented the highest figures in the first five years, experienced the fastest decrease. Moreover, its position was replaced by transportation and communication in the final years.
In 1991, over 3 million tone of acid rain was released due to household needs such as electricity, water, etc. Lower than that, transportation, and communication accounted for about 2 million tone. Simultaneously, domestic and other industries produced more than 0.5 million tone of acid rain.
By 2003, the amount of acid rain emmissed by electricity, water and gas increased slightly and surpassed the transportation and communication’s figures, which fell drastically, at just under 1 million tone. After that, those 2 statistics all went down slightly to approximately 0.5 million tone in 2007. Meanwhile, the acid rain emissions from other industries and domestic fluctuated marginally to 0.3 and 1.3 million tone in the final year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-12 | vannhi0501 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-27 | lattethuc | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 81
- The percentage of workers in a company graduated with science and art degree 87
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London, 2000-2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- People in many countries have to spend more and more time away from their home. Why is this? What are the effects on people themselves and their families? 56
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3395275931 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590425531915 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1192672341 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.4 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214706952833 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916372288577 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536886227652 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138631029772 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360366072146 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.