how do this idea in listening passage cast doubt on the ideas in the reading passage?
In this set of materials, the reading part discusses the theory was suggested by winslow taylor. It is written that time-and-motion, which is one of the most important problems in factories, he claimed that if factories had used her theory, they could have improved their workers ability, and listening section cast doubt on the information presented in the passage and argue that the theory illustrated in reading part has a negative influence on both workers and products.
First, the passage posits that factory should recognize time-wasting workers. They should calculate the time and movement of factory workers in order to improve the ability of factory. However, the lecture makes the point that, if factory evaluated movement of workers, they would be resisted and has a negative influence on workers.
The second according to the text, managers should use time-and-motion studies in their management. One the important part of the proposal is that they should distinguish lower workers because they evaluate how much they move. The speaker disagrees with this point, and, asserts that workers in the factory aren’t robots. They can’t work like a machine so they shouldn’t work like machines.
Third, the article claims that the tasks of higher-skilled workers are spread among lower-skilled workers in order to improve the operation of lower-skilled workers and factory can pay the lower cost to higher-skilled-workers. The lecture points out that if the factory gave a small task to higher-skilled-workers, they would not enjoy their tasks.
In conclusion, the talk bolsters, the mentioned piece of information in the passage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | star435 | 3 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | aniketsole | 3 | view |
| 2018-07-29 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
| 2018-07-07 | adam.joccob | 3 | view |
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement ?To improw the quality of the education, university should spend more money on salaries for university professors. use specific reason and examples to support your ansewr. 73
- TPO42 3
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 80
- tpo 50,q2 3
- how do this idea in listening passage cast doubt on the ideas in the reading passage? 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed piece of information in the passage.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46303501946 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26535889283 2.5805825403 127% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556420233463 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.4169615768 49.2860985944 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0853812181972 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329039971801 0.0996497079465 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474741476938 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.047150555917 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626788234777 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.