which one do you prefer
1. a challenging, interesting job with a few vacation days
2. a less challenging job with more vacation days
In today's hectic life, job satisfaction and its contribution to human's prosperity have been indeed a major concern for so long. Depending on personal experience, personality type, and emotional concern, people differ significantly in their attitudes towards this issue. Although many hold the idea that a challenging job with less vacation days sounds more intriguing than a simpler job with more days to rest, others counter this specific perspective. Personally speaking, I would prefer a job with less challenges and more off days for relaxation because not only does this kind of job have less tension and stress, but also there are more time available to have quality time with family and friends.
First and foremost, a simple job offering more rest days is more interesting, for it can give less negative energy and pressure while working. As a matter of fact, when an employee has several responsibilities and should accomplish different projects in the minimum time possible, gradually he feels more anxious and exhausted in comparison to those who have to put much less efforts to complete their tasks. One of the startling facts which astonished me is that people erroneously think challenging occupations brings passion and energy to the job due to many new situation employees may face in these types of vocations. To some extent, their notion does not hold water, seeing as it is based on misconceptions, and they are oblivious to the fact that everybody has a capacity to endure difficulties. Consequently, when an staff is always dealing with complicated area, after a while, he may feel much more stress than he could bear leading to some mental diseases. This whole situation becomes even worse when it comes to less days available to take a break and recover from pressures one have faced at his work place. That is why I firmly believe having a less complex job with more days for rest is more lucrative for staffs.
A further more subtle point is that owing to more time being available, employees can grasp this opportunity to have fun with the important people of their lives. In fact, an individual can plan to go on a trip with his wife, meet up with their close friends on weekend, or even spend hours playing with his children on weekend. It is axiomatic that by spending more time resting near families and friends, one can cement their relationships with them and experience more unforgettable moments near them. That is why I strongly believe a job with less difficulties and more off days is more fascinating and beneficial for employees.
To warp up, considering all the pinpoints mentioned above, we may conclude that an occupation with less challenges and more days available to rest is more attractive than a complex job with less rest days. For the sake of brevity, a few points are worth reiterating: Firstly, an individual can experience less pressure with this kind of job. Secondly, individuals have more time to spend with their immediate family and friends. All in all, it is high time authorities put more emphasis on convicting a congenial situation in which job satisfaction could increase in the best way possible.
- The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions. Since they were declared a wildlife sanctuary in 2004, development along the coastal wetlands has been pr 72
- which one do you prefer1. a challenging, interesting job with a few vacation days2. a less challenging job with more vacation days 3
- What would you prefer, to work alone or work with others 90
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to ad 83
- "Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending me 29
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
... attitudes towards this issue. Although many hold the idea that a challenging job with le...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 501, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun challenges is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...lly speaking, I would prefer a job with less challenges and more off days for relaxa...
^^^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun efforts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...omparison to those who have to put much less efforts to complete their tasks. One of...
^^^^
Line 3, column 824, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...endure difficulties. Consequently, when an staff is always dealing with complicate...
^^
Line 3, column 1027, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun days is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ion becomes even worse when it comes to less days available to take a break and reco...
^^^^
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun difficulties is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...at is why I strongly believe a job with less difficulties and more off days is more ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun challenges is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...we may conclude that an occupation with less challenges and more days available to r...
^^^^
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ressure with this kind of job. Secondly, individuals have more time to spend with...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, in fact, kind of, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2640.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 530.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98113207547 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80602007566 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520754716981 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 819.9 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.5561852581 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.947368421 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8947368421 20.6045352989 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381565732671 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136407730387 0.076458572812 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102190832666 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27145165235 0.150856017488 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509063443452 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.