a specific painting, including portrait of a woman's face, attributed to Rembrandt
Both lecture and passage discuss a specific painting, including portrait of a woman's face, attributed to Rembrandt, the most famous painters during seventeenth century. The passage talks about some properties of this painting considered as evidences showing this cannot be Rembrandt's work. In the opposite, even though the professor proves the properties mentioned in the passage, but she states that more examination of the painting and its properties justify truth of thinking about this painting done by Rembrandt. She explains the connection between these properties and the work of Rembrandt.
Firstly, both of the lecture and the passage state that the dressing way of woman in the portrait is unusual without proper details. The professor claims that the x-ray examination of painting pigments shows that some new color have covered the original paint several years after the time when painting had done. This examination shows that someone made the cloth of woman portrayed in painting unusual maybe in order to increase the value of it. In fact, in the original painting, the cloth is common with considering all details.
Secondly, the passage there are some contrasts related to light and its following shadows that cannot be made such painting by Rembrandt. Oppositely, the professor mention the removing of simple color of woman's drees in the painting and destroying the original shadow of painting. She states that in the original one, every things related to light and shadows were correct.
The passage says that the panel on which the painting was painted, made by several pieces of wood glued together in the opposite of Rembrandt's painting painted on a single woody panel. The lecture asserts that the original painting was painted on a single wood which is the same with those tree used by Rembrandt to paint almost. This panel with some extra wood in sides and top is related to the time of adding colors in order to make the painting more valuable.
In sum, the passage uses the properties found on paint to illustrate that this specific painting cannot be belong to Rembrandt, in contrast, the professor states that more exact examinations show that the original painting is exact like the Rembrandt's work and attributing this to Rembrandt is true.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | nusybah | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | Yam Kumar Oli | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Muggle | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? If you do not make sure other people (especially influential people or your employers) know about your strengths and accomplishments, you will never get successful in life. 73
- which is more important:internet or public transportation 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Advertising is the most important cause of unhealthy eating habits. 76
- Imagine that you plan to donate money to charity to help people in need. If you could give money to only one type of charitable organization, which one of the following would you choose and why?- An organization that provides food and housing to people in 73
- material found in deliberately broken T.rex's leg bone by researchers 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 30.3222958057 204% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 371.0 270.72406181 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14016172507 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57462492127 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450134770889 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 577.8 419.366225166 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.943850126 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.133333333 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7333333333 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184048802437 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793683633489 0.0996497079465 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114189943713 0.0662205650399 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11723550202 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761048740035 0.0443174109184 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.