The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate what water is used for in different areas in the world.
It is notable that the majority of water is used for agriculture, the opposite is true with domestic use.
The proportion of water uses on agriculture is the highest in South America, Africa, Central Asia and South East Asia, accouting for over a half while the figures for the last two areas are similar, at 39% and 32% for North America and Europe respectively. In terms of domestic use, all six areas use the least water, in which in Africa, Central Asia and South East Asia, people use the same amount of water, at 9% and 7% compared to more than 10% water used in the last three areas.
Regarding the remaining ways, Industry accounts for nearly a half of total water use in North America and Europe, over 5 times as much as the figures for other areas, including South America, Africa, Central Asia and South East Asia which stand at from 5% to 12%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-09 | Malokhat Khusainova | 67 | view |
| 2018-08-17 | Linhjane | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-13 | hohadang99 | 78 | view |
| 2018-02-21 | beastlycrocs55 | 67 | view |
- The charts below show the distribution of the world s water and the use of water in three countries 67
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade -labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- In many countries the costs of living are rising What are the effects on individuals and society Suggest solutions to this problem 89
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
- Technological development leads to lots of environmental issues Some people think a simple life can preserve environment while others argue that technology itself can solve it Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50877192982 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27191289027 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.4787712861 43.030603864 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.2 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2 22.9334400587 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210570233799 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161868981694 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860274318161 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175115947519 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916813818273 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.47 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.