It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development?
In the contemporary world, scientists and tourists have a tendency to explore the wilderness with the aid of technological improvement. Whereas it brings us significant changes in the positive side, we should also take some demerits of this trend into consideration.
On the one hand, making an access to such places in the middle of nowhere can be beneficial with regard to leisure and scientific field. In the first lace, this is viewed as an unusual activity. Tourists as well as scientists can have unforgettable experience with paying a visit to such remote natural environment in place of queuing for hours just to get a ticket for some well-promoted places such as a park in Hong Kong. Secondly, it is handy for people, especially scientists to explore the natural habitat which does them good for later research. For instance, The South Pole and The Amazon rainforest may be some amazing regions which are home to some rare creatures that live far away from humans.
On the other hand, visiting isolated natural places can do damage in some terms. First of all, accessing to wild regions far away from civilisation can be dangerous in case you lack essential data bout the terrain and climate. It is really challenging when you set your foot on a remote area, such as the south Pole. Its climate is freezing, so you stand a good chance of having a cold if you do not prepare enough thick coats. What is more, it is likely to cost you a lot of money if you have a desire to travel to remote natural environment because you need to spend some expenses on researching and protecting yourself. Therefore, it is not affordable for middle-class people when they do not possess a good financial situation.
To sum up, exploring isolated natural places has both merits and demerits that we should consider. Both scientists and tourists, before making up their mind to fulfil an adventure journey into the wilderness, should make a careful preparation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-18 | phantadu119@gmail.com | 78 | view |
- The way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what way has technology affected the types of relationship that people make? Has this been positive or negative developments? 56
- An American film actor once said, “Tomorrow is important and precious”. Somepeople think individuals and society should pay more attention to the future thanto the present. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the contemporary world, scientists an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rits of this trend into consideration. On the one hand, making an access to suc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 33, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...ation. On the one hand, making an access to such places in the middle of nowhere...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atures that live far away from humans. On the other hand, visiting isolated nat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot possess a good financial situation. To sum up, exploring isolated natural pl...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, for instance, such as, as well as, first of all, to sum up, what is more, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85329341317 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79002882058 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571856287425 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8512710546 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.066666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217905328164 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664718078145 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559152021495 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112385943317 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673154469041 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.