All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
The statement claims that to work efficiently companies should listen to there employees more often rather than spending money on hiring consultants from outside. It also claims that if companies were to spend more times to listening there employees then such consultant would be unnecessary. Though this statement seems logical at first glance, if we are considering the complexity and competetiveness of the current world such consultant is necessity. There more than enough reasons to support this claim.
As we can see, today's market is constantly changing due to its inherent cosmopolitan and multi-national nature. It's not a cakewalk to study the patterns observed in this markets and predict the outcome. The experts spend there most of the time studying the behavior of the market, the novel technologies available for the better of the companies and many other things. Its not necessary that such in depth knowledge of market can be gained from spending more time listening to employees. Rather it is requirement that one should be updated with the current development in
the relevant market from outside the company.
Another important reason that can be attributed to the outside consultancy is disinterested vision. It is often possible that the management of the company has prejudice about some issue and it will be better to have some neutral, some one who can think with unbiased vision to see the whole spectrum. This often keeps the personal benefits of the employees of the companies from interfering with the company policies. The famous example that can be given is NASA asked famous scientist Richard Feynman to invistigate the Challenger Space shuttle failure. The physicist provided the much neede neutral view and experties needed for the investigation and conclusion was drawn.
At same time it is also true that companies should listen to there employees. Hiring of the expert is just one step in making the policies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...cosmopolitan and multi-national nature. Its not a cakewalk to study the patterns ob...
^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ewalk to study the patterns observed in this markets and predict the outcome. The ex...
^^^^
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...nding more time listening to employees. Rather it is requirement that one should be up...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 572, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... updated with the current development in the relevant market from outside the com...
^^^
Line 6, column 232, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...it will be better to have some neutral, some one who can think with unbiased vision to s...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 314.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22929936306 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79745483972 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53821656051 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.459394171 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.625 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.21951772744 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374168101377 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121590827326 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123931670708 0.0758088955206 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182355783548 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108489917392 0.0667264976115 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.