material found in deliberately broken T.rex's leg bone by researchers
Both the passage and the lecture discuss material found in deliberately broken T.rex's leg bone by researchers. The passage claims that this material were remaining material of blood vessels, red blood cells, and collagen matrix of dinosaur and provide three evidences for its claim. The professor, in the contrast, throws doubt on the passages claim and denies all its evidences.
Firstly, the reading considers the branching channels inside the broken leg bon as hollows related to blood vessels and presence of the soft, flexible organic substance inside those channels may are the remaining of real T.rek's blood vessels. In the contrast, the professor refutes this explanation by saying that those hollows can be related to colonization of bacteria in the death bodies of dinosaurs and other animals and accordingly such soft materials were left by these bacteria.
Secondly, according to reading, it can be thought that the existence of spheres contained vital material of blood cells, iron, revealed by microscopically examination are the remaining of red blood cells. The professor disagrees with this too. He states that these foundation were in the same animals cannot be related to blood cells and the origin of them are from external of their bodies.
Third, the passage said that collagen found during the a test, but the lecture refutes this by explaining that collagen cannot remain more than 1000years. This fact make a contradiction between this fact and the old of those fossils, 70 million years old fossil. The collagon which reveals during test is probably from human skin when the researchers touched those bones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-15 | nusybah | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | Vivian Chang | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | rodriannnn | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | reza_fattahi | 80 | view |
- declining of population of sea otters 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement? People will spend less time cooking and preparing food in twenty years. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People would be happier with fewer possessions 73
- In universities, people tend to concern more about the career prospect of the subjects they learn. Some people propose that students should learn subjects with a fast job growth including math, science, technology, and engineering even if they are interes 73
- whether or not electronic medical records, which doctors store information of patients in electronic databases, outweigh paper forms 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this foundation' or 'these foundations'?
Suggestion: this foundation; these foundations
...disagrees with this too. He states that these foundation were in the same animals cannot be rela...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 52, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...passage said that collagen found during the a test, but the lecture refutes this by e...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 165, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'makes'.
Suggestion: makes
...t remain more than 1000years. This fact make a contradiction between this fact and t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25572519084 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62235962479 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572519083969 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1155253435 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.181818182 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171604330294 0.272083759551 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730243081481 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141894376371 0.0662205650399 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977951318668 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920582807054 0.0443174109184 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.