Some sports are considered extremely dangerous, but many people still like them. Why do people take part in dangerous sports? Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers.
Recently, the phenomenon of some sports are considered extremely dangerous, but many people still like them. Why do people take part in dangerous sports? and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that dangerous sports can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, some sports can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, dangerous sports might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of some dangerous sports far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss 85
- Some sports are considered extremely dangerous, but many people still like them. Why do people take part in dangerous sports? Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers. 80
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 80
- Children should learn good handwriting, or typing at school, which one is more important? 85
- Whether the design of the buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, still, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72058823529 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13514788314 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 0.931034482759 752% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3961443005 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.454545455 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447333556292 0.242375264174 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173194905099 0.0925447433944 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16919578607 0.071462118173 237% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292984444803 0.151781067708 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060126566324 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 53.1260098522 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.