At The Time End of Each Term, Student Evaluation of Faculty Should be Posted Online
Every faculty has student evaluation for the better of study. Evaluations decide of the value or quality the subject. The student makes the evaluation because the important of point on subject can help for final exam at the time end of each term. One of way to make the good evaluation study and observes the important point of the subject. You will found things to good evaluation.
At the time end of each term, student evaluation should be post to the online web because they studied good arrange enough. After that, the student can by self-evaluation for final task in the university. The university should give a good server to student evaluation. For example university of instructor open the event to answer of question about topic for student evaluation. It works for a study time. The instructor in university should teach how to post online student evaluation itself.
In after that, student evaluation posted in internet can help the other student ready for prepare because many students still do not understand with system study by instructor university. At the time of each term, student should understand about regulation of internet on faculty. If you post student evaluation at the time end of term, that is must be interested to read.
Not at all faculty should post online student evaluation because faculty give not good server on the study and university. Many students do not understand and still cannot do the term. So, they are disagree with the system of organization should posted student evaluation.
Simply, the university or faculty should not push the student to posted student evaluation at the time end of each term.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-12-12 | asmaamanina | 55 | view |
- Do You Agree or Disagree The Parents are The Best Teacher For Children 50
- At The Time End of Each Term Student Evaluation of Faculty Should be Posted Online 55
- The Graph Show the Satisfaction Rating In Four Collages from 1991 to 2002 70
- Freshmen Should Not be Required to Purchase a Meal Plan from the Collage 28
Sentence: You will found things to good evaluation.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, past participle
Suggestion: Refer to will and found
Sentence: After that, the student can by self-evaluation for final task in the university.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a preposition
Suggestion: Refer to can and by
university of instructor open the event
instructors in university open the event
Sentence: In after that, student evaluation posted in internet can help the other student ready for prepare because many students still do not understand with system study by instructor university.
Description: The token for is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to for and prepare
Sentence: If you post student evaluation at the time end of term, that is must be interested to read.
Description: The token is is not usually followed by a modal auxillary
Suggestion: Refer to is and must
Sentence: So, they are disagree with the system of organization should posted student evaluation.
Description: The fragment disagree with the is not usually preceded by are
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace are with is
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, past participle
Suggestion: Refer to should and posted
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Different Words: 108 200
Read a good grammar book. Maybe this one: http://www.testbig.com/question/grammar
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 9
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 275 350
No. of Characters: 1344 1500
No. of Different Words: 108 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.072 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.887 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.606 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 97 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 72 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 40 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.278 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.063 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.278 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.413 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.58 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.142 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5