Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motobikes. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Whether the government should increase the minimum age for using motorized vehicles or not is a major topic of concern in today's society. While some people believe the lowest legal age would be changed to diminish the danger in road, I am of the opinion that it is not the optimum way to limit traffic accidents.
To begin with, there are two reason as to why the legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes need to be raised. Firstly, being not enough mature and responsible to be full aware of the importance of abide by rules, the young people are likely to break the law and cause the accidents. Moreover, the older people usually more experienced, thereby knowing how to handle dangerous situations while the young ones might be confuse. For example, if a brake of car suddenly stopped working, some youngsters would be panic and could not be navigate their cars, which lead to fatal scenarior. Secondly, in terms of traffic jam, the increasing number of means of transport could be attributed to the low level of age for driving. Therefore, the authorities should reform the law about driving age.
However, I am firmly convinced that there are other effective measures to mitigate traffic problems. The first one is that the government should impose heavy taxes on cars, petrol, road rolls. It not only help to reduce the number of engine – powered vehicles, but also make a budget for the government to construct and repair roads. Another measure is upgrading the traffic transports to service inhabitants. Citizens, as a results, could use buses and trans intead of cars and motorbikes.
In conclusion, although increasing the legal age for driving cars and riding motorbikes is beneficial in some views, I am strongly believe that there are more feasible soulutions to tackle traffic issues.
- In some country the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing.What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them. 73
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 78
- The illustrations below show how coffee is sometimes produce 53
- The table below describes victims by age group and offence category in Venezuela, 1999. 78
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...ts to service inhabitants. Citizens, as a results, could use buses and trans intead of ca...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
...beneficial in some views, I am strongly believe that there are more feasible soulutions...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96393442623 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59946452221 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577049180328 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.879218157 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.142857143 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7857142857 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250847884816 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811847074048 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073787492726 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169083130485 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793810874771 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.