The graph below shows the number of international conferences in three capital cities between 1980 and 2010.
The given line chart illustrates the figure for global meetings measures in different capital cities during the period 1980 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that there was a considerable fluctuation movement in the number of international conferences in three city centers over the 30 - year period. However, the increase in worldwide assemblies from city C was particularly significant.
In 1980, the global conferences did not appear in city C. There was a remarkable rise to a figure for 35 meetings by 2010, with a sharp increase between 1985 and 2000 and slight fall over next 5 years.
City A accounted for about 35 meetings in 1980. This figure fell dramatically to 20 meetings in 1985, and then fluctuate to around 30 meetings in 2005 that was nearly twice as high as for the end of the period( 15 meetings). Furthermore, city B witnessed a slow decline under 30 meetings throughout the period, whereas city A and city B had a fairly equal proportion of global conferences in 1995 and 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-20 | Tran Ngoc Anh | 46 | view |
| 2018-09-20 | Tran Ngoc Anh | 81 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of international conferences in three capital cities between 1980 and 2010 81
- The graph below shows the number of international conferences in three capital cities between 1980 and 2010 46
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. to what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 753.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88961038961 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86530067722 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62987012987 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2796863947 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.125 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230762771695 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113730692243 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786647111277 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150237593863 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052587602558 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.