Do you agree or disagree? A person should never make an important decision alone.
Nowadays, for every step of our lives we need to make decisions, like in a game. Sometimes it is hard, and sometimes it is easy, to give a decision. We could regret from our decisions, or feel happy about our decision. The important point to get what we desire is after making the decision we need to evaluate the situation clearly, and specify all the options clearly. Also, we can take help from others. That aspect will make the decision process easier. In this way, I strongly believe person should not make the decision alone for two reasons which I will explain in the following essay.
First of all, the reason to be mention is bearing the consequences. If you make the decision with someone, then after your decision you do not need to bear all the consequences on your own, because you took help, and there will be someone with you to stand beside you, to support your decision. People might state it is better to be alone, but it is not. For example, I made a significant decision for my senior project, and I was not alone to make this decision. It was a group project, so we decided together, we took the action together. However, it ended up in a bad result. I felt regret, but I was not the only one who made this decision, so we stood behind this consequence together. It made me feel comfortable. Thus, In my view person should not make important decision alone, because when you give the decision with someone, you will not have to take all the responsibility.
Furthermore, the other reason is people’s opinion can guide you to make the true decision. When you make a decision, if you take help from other who is more experienced than you, then it should be better for you. For instance, when I make a decision about my future career, I always get help from my professor, because they have experiences, and I can get benefit from them. They can be a guide for me. People might claim no one should involved for the important decision, conversely they should involve, since they can just save you from a big mistake. Hence, I believe making decision with other could be more beneficial for person compared to making alone.
In nut shell, I support a person should not make the significant decision alone, you may get help from others who have experiences about the topic, since that can direct you the true option. Additionally, whether the result is good, or bad you do not need to take all the responsibilities, because you did not make the decision alone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | Luis Cortes | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | Bobby1987 | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | ChristineSmb | 81 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Kamalkhan | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | jeffhjz | 76 | view |
- eco- toruism? 3
- Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. 70
- When people travel, they visit the museums. Why do you think they visit the museums? 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 9.8082437276 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2044.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59325842697 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58834656434 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422471910112 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 653.4 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.977966463 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1666666667 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5416666667 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323023114671 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097216727625 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101236592657 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239972817993 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660165387908 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.